No presente livro, pesquisadores enfocam temas que têm, direta ou indiretamente, relação com a LDB. Olham e estudam a realidade educacional de vários. the Ford Foundation, the lnter-. American Development Bank (lDB), the lnternational Bank for Reconstruction and Edición revisada. Centro Internacional de. Looking for Documents about LDB spec? Ldb Atualizada e ComentadaLdb start up modeo. LDB Revisada até · Documents · LDB Ensino Superior.
|Published (Last):||22 December 2017|
|PDF File Size:||2.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The size of an array is its element size multiplied by the number of its elements. The address of an element is the sum of the array’s address and the element’s index multiplied by the element size.
Let the following general declarations be given:. Note that for the computation of the size the array’s lengths in all dimensions are known, because they occur as constants in the program text. However, the index values needed for the computation of an element’s address are typically not known before program execution. In contrast, for record structures, both type size and field address are known at compile time. Let us consider the following declarations:.
Absolute addresses of variables are usually unknown at the time of compilation. All generated addresses must be considered as relative to a common base address which is given at run-time. The effective address is then the sum of this base address and the address determined by the compiler.
If a computer’s store is byte-addressed, as is fairly common, a further point must be considered. Although bytes can be accessed individually, typically a small number of bytes say 4 or 8 are transferred from or to memory as a packet, a so-called word. If allocation occurs strictly in sequential order it is possible that a variable may occupy parts of several words see Figure 8.
But this should definitely be avoided, a[0, 0] a[0, 1] a[1, 0] a[1, 1] a: A simple method of overcoming this problem is to round up or down each variable’s address to the next multiple of its size.
This process is called alignment. The rule holds for elementary data types. For arrays, the size of their element type is relevant, and for records we simply round up to the computer’s word size. The price of alignment is the loss of some bytes in memory, which is quite negligible. The following additions to the parsing procedure for declarations are necessary to generate the required symbol table entries:. IdentList Var, first ; Type1 tp ; obj: Here, procedure IdentList is used to process an identifier list, and the recursive procedure Type1 serves to compile a type declaration.
Get sym ; NEW type ; type. Following a longstanding tradition, addresses of variables are assigned negative values, that is, negative offsets to the common base address determined during program execution.
The auxiliary procedures OpenScope and CloseScope ensure that the list of record fields is not intermixed with the list of variables. Every record declaration establishes a new scope of visibility of field identifiers, as required by the definition of the language Oberon. Note that the list into which new entries are inserted is rooted in the global variable topScope.
The scope of identifiers is defined to extend from the place of declaration to the end of the procedure in which the declaration occurs.
What would be necessary to let this range extend from the beginning to the end of the procedure? Consider pointer declarations as defined in Oberon. They specify a type to which the declared pointer is bound, and this type may occur later in the text. What is necessary to accommodate this relaxation of the rule that all referenced entities must be declared prior to their use? It is worth noticing that our compiler, up to this point, could be developed without reference to the target computer for which it is to generate code.
But why indeed should the target machine’s lcb influence lsb analysis and error handling? On the contrary, such an influence should consciously be avoided.
1ª Edição Jornal Verdade REVISADA
As a result, code generation for an arbitrary computer may be added according to the principle of stepwise refinement to the existing, machine independent parser, revsiada serves like a scaffolding.
Before undertaking this task, however, a specific target architecture must be selected. To keep both the resulting compiler reasonably simple and the development clear of details that are of relevance only for a specific machine and its idiosyncrasies, we postulate an architecture according to our own choice. Thereby we gain the considerable advantage that it can be tailored to the needs of the source language.
This architecture does not exist as a real machine; it is therefore virtual. But since every computer executes instructions according to a fixed algorithm, it can easily be specified revisadda a program.
A real computer may then be used to execute this program which interprets the generated code. The program is called an interpreter, and it emulates the virtual machine, which therefore can be said to have a semi-real existence. It is not the aim of this text to present the motivations for our choice of the specific virtual architecture with all its details.
LDB spec Documents –
This chapter is rather intended to serve as a descriptive manual consisting of an informal introduction and a formal definition of the computer in the form of the interpretive program. This formalization may even be considered as an example of an exact specification of a processor. In the definition of this computer we intentionally follow closely the line of RISC-architectures.
The acronym RISC stands for reduced instruction set computer, where “reduced” is to be understood as relative to architectures with large sets of complex instructions, as these were dominant until about This is obviously not the place to explain the essence of the RISC architecture, nor to expound on its various advantages. Here it is obviously attractive because of its simplicity and clarity of concepts, which simplify the description of the instruction set and the choice of instruction sequences corresponding to specific language constructs.
The architecture chosen here is almost identical to the one presented by Hennessy and Patterson under revisxda name DLX. The small deviations are due to our desire for increased regularity. From the viewpoints of the revisaxa and the compiler designer the computer consists of rfvisada arithmetic unit, a control unit and a store.
The arithmetic unit contains 16 registers R0 — R15, with 32 bits each. The control unit consists of the instruction register IR, holding the instruction currently being executed, and the program counter PC, holding the address of the instruction to be fetched next Figure 9.
The program counter is included in the set of data registers: Branch instructions to subroutines implicitly use register R14 to store the return address.
The memory consists of bit words, and it is byte-addressed, that is, word addresses are multiples of 4. There are three types of instructions and instruction formats. Register instructions operate on registers only and feed data through a shifter and the arithmetic logic unit ALU.
Memory instructions fetch and store data in memory. Branch instructions affect the program counter. MOV a, c R. In the case of register instructions there are two variants. Either the second operand is an immediate value F1and the bit constant im is sign extended to 32 bits.
Or the second operand is a register F0. LDW a, b, im R. The virtual computer is defined by the following interpreter program in more detail. Note that register PC holds word addresses instead of byte addresses, and that Z and N are status bits set be comparison instructions. We have added them here to provide a simple and effective way for input and output. Compiled and interpreted programs can thus be tested and obtain a certain reality.
Without them, it would not make sense to speak about a byte-oriented computer. However, we refrain from specifying them here, because such program statements would hardly mirror their implementation in hardware truthfully. They will allow the handling of procedure parameters in a convenient way see Chapter The third example in Chapter 5 showed how to convert an expression from conventional infix form into its equivalent postfix form.
Our ideal computer would be capable of directly interpreting postfix notation. As also shown, such an ideal computer requires a stack for holding intermediate results. Such a computer architecture is called a stack architecture. Compiler Construction – Niklaus Wirth hugo row Enviado por: Parte 7 de 8 The size of an array is its element size multiplied by the number of its elements. Let the following general declarations be given: T Then type size and element address are obtained by the following equations: Representation of a matrix.
Let us consider the following declarations: T Then the type’s size and the field addresses are computed according to the following formulas: Alignment in address computation. The following additions to the parsing procedure for declarations are necessary to generate the required symbol table entries: Object ; VAR obj: Type ; VAR n: A RISC-Architecture as Target It is worth noticing that our compiler, up to this point, could be developed without reference to the target computer for which it is to generate code.
Resources and registers From the viewpoints of the programmer and the compiler designer the computer consists of an arithmetic unit, a control unit and a store.
Block diagram of the RISC structure. Construindo compiladores Engineering a Compiler, de Cooper e Torczon.