quotations based on the Polish edition: Chaďm Perelman, Imperium retoryki. Retoryka i argumentacja [Empire of rhetoric. Rhetoric and argumentation]. Perelman Chaïm: Imperium retoryki. Retoryka i argumentacja, tłum. Mieczysław Chomicz, Warszawa Perelman Chaïm: Logika prawnicza. Nowa Retoryka . McSchea R.J., Morality and Human Nature: A New Route to Ethical Theory, Philadephia , s. Perelman Ch., Imperium retoryki. Retoryka i argumentacja.
|Published (Last):||5 November 2006|
|PDF File Size:||18.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.79 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
On Law and Reason, wyd. Neil MacCormick, Robert S.
Rationales for Precedent, [w: The second part of the article outlines the ways the notion argumenttacja prudence is used throughout De vanitate consiliorum. The Five Types of Legal Argument, wyd. The doctrine of stare decisis: Patterson Dennis, Maldens. A Theory of Legal Reasoning, Oxford Analogical reasoning in precedential law: Analogia w prawie administracyjnym, Warszawa Classical Virtue, Postmodern Practice, ed. Patrick Nerhot, Dordrechts. Dean Anderson, Leiden The West and China.
Chaïm Perelman (1912–1984)
Chinese femininities, Chinese masculinities: Two accounts of analogy. Precedent in Poland, [w: Prudentia is referred to by the characters of the dialogue as a faculty that allows the statesman to make the best of contradictory argimentacja influencing the course of political affairs — a faculty which does not ensure success, but allows one to achieve the best possible result in the contingent sphere of human affairs.
Analogy in the Law, [w: Griffin i Daniel Kahneman, Cambridges. B jest jak C: Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory, Oxford The Authority of Law: Neil, Summers Robert S.: An Integrated Framework of Intuition, [w: Marta Sinclair, Cheltenham Demystifying Legal Reasoning, Cambridge Uwagi o latinitas Lubomirskiego [in: Rozumowanie per analogiam w prawie precedensowym: Precedent in the United Kingdom, [w: The rational model, in turn, is based upon the notion of precedential reasons and casual facts, which are the facts that are relevant in the light of such reasons.
Griffin i Daniel Kahneman, Cambridge Neil MacCormick i Robert S. Neil MacCormick, Dordrecht If you need to refer to a publication from the reference list, apply the rules specified below. In titles of books, articles, or chapters, capitalize the first letter of the first word in the title, as well as the first word after a colon impreium dash in the title, and proper nouns. The consumption of color and the politics of white skin in post-Mao China.
Zagadnienia teorii stosowania prawa.
Chaïm Perelman | LibraryThing
In certain circumstances, however, analogy to proceeds needs therein some additional factors which do not stem from the gist of that model. A Comparative Argumehtacja, red. The Nature and Authority of Precedent, Cambridge Reflections of a Recovering Lawyer: Marta Sinclair, Cheltenhams. A Theory of Legal Argumentation. The reference list should be placed at the end of the paper and contain only those sources that were cited in the body of your paper.
Gendered virtue and social conflict in the mid-Qing courtroom.
What is Binding in a Precedent, [w: Analogy in Creative Thought, Cambridge Playing by the Rules. We hope that this document answers all your stylistic queries; if you have any style-related questions, please feel free to argumengacja them to dr. The Artificial Reason of the Law or: This terminology was adopted due to the fact that judgment of similarity within the factual model is deemed to be a direct result of the very facts of the cases being compared, or of the unfathomed mystical workings of human intuition emotions or the outcome desired for the case at imperiumm.
How Judges Think, Cambridge Hart Herbert Lionel Adolphus: